| Property | Value |
|
linkedct:arm_group
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/arm_group/21960>
|
|
linkedct:arm_group
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/arm_group/2251>
|
|
linkedct:arm_group
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/arm_group/24777>
|
|
linkedct:brief_title
|
Cortisone or Drug Eluting Stents (DES) as CompRed to Bare Metal Stents (BMS) to EliminAte Restenosis
|
|
linkedct:collaborator_agency
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/collabagency/6682>
|
|
linkedct:condition
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/condition/1288>
|
|
linkedct:condition
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/condition/3372>
|
|
linkedct:condition
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/condition/6895>
|
|
linkedct:criteria
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with diagnosed CAD (either SVD or MVD) with signs or symptoms of myocardial
ischemia, scheduled for percutaneous revascularization are all candidates.
- Either native vessels and SVG can be included with de-novo or recurrent lesions.
- Lesions causing a diameter stenosis >50% in a main coronary artery (LAD, RCA, LCx) or
their principal branches (Dg, OM, PL, PDA).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diabetes
- Age over 80 years old
- Recent Q wave myocardial infarction (less than 2 weeks)
- Severe hypertension, uncontrolled despite medical treatment
- Gastric ulcer or symptomatic gastritis
- Neoplasia
- Renal failure (creatinine >2.5)
- Left main disease, or left main equivalent (proximal LAD and proximal LCx), or three
vessel disease involving the proximal segments of the 3 main coronary branches
- Suboptimal angiographic result of PCI (DS% >30% or TIMI flow
|
|
linkedct:description
|
Design of the study
It is very important to underline that this is a "spontaneous" study, i.e. not receiving
sponsorship from pharmaceutical industries, stent manufacturers, or any other financial
source. This independence from economic interests would contribute to exclude conflicts of
interest that may bias the results of the study that is aimed at testing the applicability
and the clinical efficacy of this therapy. Furthermore, the assessment of the DES in public
hospitals, and beyond the spectrum of the industry-supported studies may offer interesting
results of the real life use of these devices.
One of the purposes of the study is a cost-effectiveness analysis. Centers participating in
the study should therefore perform PCI according to their common practice with no
interference in their decision-making process or technical approach to PCI because of the
inclusion of the patients into a randomized study; this is aimed at obtaining an as real as
possible situation of the daily practice. Being an spontaneous research, neither a fee will
be provided for the enrollment of patients, nor free stents will be given.
The allocation of patients into a BMS or DES treatment will be decided by randomization, and
the stents implanted will be selected according to the operator's preference.
The study will include three different groups of patients:
- Control group: receiving BMS;
- DES group: receiving DES;
- Prednisone group: receiving BMS and oral prednisone
Principal objective of the study: is the comparison of the primary endpoint obtained in a
control group of patients treated with BMS versus two alternative study groups:
- DES
- BMS and oral prednisone All assuming a similar adjunctive conventional medical
treatment.
Secondary endpoint of the study are:
- cost-effectiveness analysis. This will be calculated considering all patients enrolled
in the study and analyzed after one year of the treatment. The analysis will take into
account the procedural cost of the PCI material, the cost of the medical treatment in
the first year of follow-up and the number of event-free days at follow-up. The
cost-efficacy analysis will be obtained from the ratio between the cost of the
event-free day of follow-up and the possibility of MACE considered in the primary
endpoint of the study.
- comparison of the angiographic results. This will be calculated in all patients
enrolled.
|
|
linkedct:download_date
|
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on December 30, 2009
|
|
linkedct:eligibility_gender
|
Both
|
|
linkedct:eligibility_healthy_volunteers
|
No
|
|
linkedct:eligibility_maximum_age
|
80 Years
|
|
linkedct:eligibility_minimum_age
|
18 Years
|
|
linkedct:end_date
|
October 2011
|
|
linkedct:enrollment
|
375
(xsd:int)
|
|
linkedct:firstreceived_date
|
August 24, 2006
|
|
linkedct:has_dmc
|
Yes
|
|
linkedct:id
|
NCT00369356
|
|
linkedct:intervention
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/intervention/107444>
|
|
linkedct:intervention
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/intervention/69875>
|
|
linkedct:intervention
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/intervention/80388>
|
|
rdfs:label
|
Trial NCT00369356
|
|
linkedct:lastchanged_date
|
November 19, 2009
|
|
linkedct:lead_sponsor_agency
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/agency/2845>
|
|
linkedct:location
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/location/306520>
|
|
linkedct:location
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/location/330155>
|
|
linkedct:location
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/location/77794>
|
|
linkedct:location
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/location/78357>
|
|
linkedct:location
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/location/78894>
|
|
linkedct:nct_id
|
NCT00369356
|
|
linkedct:number_of_arms
|
3
(xsd:int)
|
|
linkedct:number_of_groups
|
0
(xsd:int)
|
|
linkedct:official_title
|
Clinical and Angiographic Outcome of Patients Treated With Bare Metal Stent (BMS) Implantation Compared With Drug Eluting Stents or BMS Plus Systemic Prednisone Therapy. A Randomized, Multicentre Study.
|
|
linkedct:org_study_id
|
CEREA-DES
|
|
linkedct:overall_official
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/overall_official/10592>
|
|
linkedct:overall_official
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/overall_official/17863>
|
|
linkedct:overall_official
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/overall_official/59895>
|
|
linkedct:overall_status
|
Active, not recruiting
|
|
linkedct:oversight
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/oversight/1601>
|
|
foaf:page
|
<http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00369356>
|
|
linkedct:phase
|
Phase 2/Phase 3
|
|
linkedct:primary_completion_date
|
October 2009
|
|
linkedct:primary_outcomes
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/primary_outcomes/30756>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/15677>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/29051>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/32157>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/33698>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/33859>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/34226>
|
|
linkedct:reference
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/reference/34490>
|
|
linkedct:secondary_outcomes
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/secondary_outcomes/32238>
|
|
linkedct:secondary_outcomes
|
<http://data.linkedct.org/resource/secondary_outcomes/8457>
|
|
linkedct:source
|
Universita di Verona
|
|
linkedct:start_date
|
October 2006
|
|
linkedct:study_design
|
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
|
|
linkedct:study_type
|
Interventional
|
|
linkedct:summary
|
The possibility of using the new drug eluting stents (DES) technology has significantly
changed the mid-term outcome of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in terms of
reduced recurrence of angina. The way interventionalists accomplish their work is changing
accordingly, with a strong trend to a wider use of DES and a consequent perceived patients'
clinical benefit.
Evidences supporting the superiority of DES in reducing ischemic recurrence after PCI
compared to traditional stents (BMS) are available from randomized studies. A recent
meta-analyses underlines that:
DES are superior to BMS in reducing clinical recurrence of ischemia, DES and BMS offer
identical results in terms of death and infarction, Rapamycin and paclitaxel DES offer
similar results.
The aim of our study is to perform a multicenter, randomized study to assess the clinical
efficacy and safety of the oral prednisone therapy after PCI as a possible systemic
alternative to currently available BMS and DES. Furthermore, the study aims at analyzing the
clinical outcome of the commercially available DES in the context of an independent research
and a cost-benefit comparison with BMS and oral steroids.
|
|
rdf:type
|
linkedct:trials
|
|
linkedct:verification_date
|
November 2009
|